Publication:
Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality

dc.contributor.authorYmamgulyyeva, A.
dc.contributor.authorKafesçioğlu, Nilüfer
dc.contributor.authorHarma, M.
dc.contributor.departmentPsychology
dc.contributor.ozuauthorKAFESCİOĞLU, Nilüfer
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T06:38:04Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T06:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to investigate the actor–partner effects of attitudes toward group-based inequality as measured by social dominance orientation (SDO) and marital quality, and the indirect actor–partner effects of SDO on marital quality via ambivalent sexism and partners' perceptions of their own relationship power toward their partner. Background: Previous research suggests that certain social attitudes play a role in relationship processes. However, it is unclear whether broader views on social inequality could have an effect on partners' marital quality. Method: Ninety heterosexual married couples in Turkey (N = 180) responded via an online survey on SDO, marital quality, relationship power, and ambivalent sexism. Actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) and actor–partner interdependence model of mediation (APIMeM) were conducted to examine the direct and indirect actor–partner effects. Results: For indirect effects, men's SDO was negatively associated with their marital quality through their relationship power and hostile sexism. No significant indirect effects were found for women. However, women's relationship power was positively and their benevolent sexism was negatively associated with their own and their partners' marital quality. Conclusion: Our findings help develop a more comprehensive understanding of how the political, social, and personal aspects of our lives are connected with one another. Implications: Our study points to the importance of exploring the topic of men's and women's views toward social inequality and its effects on their close relationships in clinical practice and relational education.en_US
dc.description.versionPublisher versionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/fare.12881en_US
dc.identifier.issn0197-6664en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152022761
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/8909
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12881
dc.identifier.wos000965200000001
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublished onlineen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFamily Relations
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational Refereed Journal
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.keywordsDyadic analysisen_US
dc.subject.keywordsMarital qualityen_US
dc.subject.keywordsRelationship poweren_US
dc.subject.keywordsSexismen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSocial dominance orientationen_US
dc.titleExamining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital qualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationeb613b06-2aad-4fc0-baba-a9a816d9132e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryeb613b06-2aad-4fc0-baba-a9a816d9132e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality.pdf
Size:
765.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.45 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections