Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÜsdiken, Behlül
dc.contributor.authorKipping, M.
dc.contributor.authorEngwall, L.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T13:30:13Z
dc.date.available2023-04-24T13:30:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.issn1537-260Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/8138
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.aom.org/doi/full/10.5465/amle.2020.0109
dc.description.abstractOver the past two decades, prompted in part by a series of corporate scandals, different views have been voiced about whyU.S. business schools have purportedly lost their originalambitiontobecomeprofessional schoolsand, thus, tomakemanagementa"true" profession, and how this ambition could be restored. This paper puts these debates into a longer-termperspectivebyshowingthatsuchclaimshavebeenpresentformorethanacentury. Thepaperexaminestheevolvingrhetoricoftheprotagonistsandtheircriticsoverfive periods, eachmarkedbydifferentcontexts,whichshapedtheambitions of schools ofbusiness to be recognized as professional schools. These claims, the paper shows, had a common thread for over 100 years, which was the recurring reference to other professional schools-namely those ofmedicine and law, and at times engineering,which had already achieved the coveted status when U.S. business schools first originated. We ultimately argue that, given the rhetorical nature of these claims, suggestions that business schools lost theirwayoroughttoreturntosomeidealizedpastarelargelyfutile.Futurediscussions should therefore focus on purpose and power rather than profession.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGeorge Washington Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAcademy of Management Learning and Education
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleProfessional school obsession: An enduring yet shifting rhetoric by U.S. business schoolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.contributor.departmentÖzyeğin University
dc.contributor.authorID(ORCID 0000-0002-3233-8634 & YÖK ID 7830) Üsdiken, Behlül
dc.contributor.ozuauthorÜsdiken, Behlül
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage442en_US
dc.identifier.endpage458en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000704896000009
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/amle.2020.0109en_US
dc.identifier.scopusSCOPUS:2-s2.0-85112841230
dc.relation.publicationcategoryArticle - International Refereed Journal - Institutional Academic Staff


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Share this page