Graduate School of Engineering and Science

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/10679/8952

Browse

Browsing by Institution Author "ERTUNÇ, Özgür"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Placeholder
    ArticlePublicationMetadata only
    Automated flow rate control of extrusion for 3D concrete printing incorporating rheological parameters
    (Elsevier, 2024-04) Ahi, Oğulcan; Ertunç, Özgür; Bundur, Zeynep Başaran; Bebek, Özkan; Civil Engineering; Mechanical Engineering; ERTUNÇ, Özgür; BUNDUR, Zeynep Başaran; BEBEK, Özkan; Ahi, Oğulcan
    The use of inline quality assessment technologies is of great importance in meeting the consistent extrusion requirements of 3D concrete printing (3DCP) applications. This paper presents a system to regulate extrusion speed and maintain the flow rate at a target value during 3DCP processes. The system is based on a new equation that combines printing parameters and the material's rheological properties in the printing process. The proposed control strategy is designed to effectively function with various cement-based mixtures. Validation tests demonstrate that the proposed system can maintain an instantaneous flow rate within a certain range and eventually achieve a constant flow rate. During operation, the flow rate is consistently maintained around the targeted value with an average error rate of 6.7 percent. The flow rate control mechanism shows promise as a reliable and efficient solution for achieving precise and constant flow rates, regardless of the cement mix design used.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference ObjectPublicationOpen Access
    The effect of interface gradient distribution on unrealistic flow in 3D droplet simulations
    (Europe, Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ILASS, 2021-08-31) Yılmaz, Anıl; Kayansalçik, Gökhan; Ertunç, Özgür; Mechanical Engineering; ERTUNÇ, Özgür; Yılmaz, Anıl; Kayansalçik, Gökhan
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the origin of the parasitic current to provide accurate prediction of droplet surface interactions in Volume of Fluid (VOF) framework. The deformation of the droplet due to parasitic current has been the most important problem in 3D simulations. Parasitic current is influenced by curvature and surface normal estimation in the Continuum Surface Force (CSF) model. It has been shown that the number of neighboring cells of the central cell influences the gradient calculations regarding the generation of parasitic current. It has been observed that the polyhedral cell structure delivers a smoother interface gradient distribution than the cartesian cell structure. To examine the dynamics in different physical conditions, we compared simulations with base experiments to understand whether those models work. We then simulated droplet cases on stationary and moving wall conditions, and simulation results were consistent with experimental results.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference ObjectPublicationOpen Access
    Validation and comparison of 2D and 3D numerical simulations of flow in simplex nozzles
    (Europe, Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ILASS, 2021-08-31) Bal, M.; Kayansalçik, Gökhan; Ertunç, Özgür; Böke, Y. E.; Mechanical Engineering; ERTUNÇ, Özgür; Kayansalçik, Gökhan
    Numerical simulations of pressure swirl atomizers are computationally expensive due to transient and multiphase flow behavior. In this study, 2D and 3D VOF simulations are performed for a geomerty which has high swirl chamber length-to-diameter ratio of 1.33. discharge coefficient (CD) and spray angle values are compared to the experimental data. Moreover, a benchmark study is conducted between 2D and 3D methods in terms of accuracy, computational cost and flow variables such as orifice exit axial and tangential velocity. The simulations are performed using a hybrid RANS-LES approach, IDDES model. It is observed that 2D simulation has lower accuracy in the validation parameters such as discharge coefficient and spray angle as compared to the 3D simulation. The main reason for 2D simulation inaccuracy might be the tangential port inlet effects and wrong estimation of the loss of swirl inside the swirl chamber. On the other hand, 2D simulations have approximately 1000 times lower computational cost than 3D simulations.