Browsing by Author "Bal, M."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
ArticlePublication Metadata only Benchmark study of 2D and 3D VOF simulations of a simplex nozzle using a hybrid RANS-LES approach(Elsevier, 2022-07-01) Bal, M.; Kayansalçik, Gökhan; Ertunç, Özgür; Erhan Böke, Y.; Mechanical Engineering; ERTUNÇ, Özgür; Kayansalçik, GökhanIn this study, a simplex nozzle is tested with water for the benchmarking of different flow simulation models. A large scale Plexi-glass transparent nozzle is used to reduce the influence of production tolerances on the performance. Experiments are conducted at different flow rates and CD, spray angle and film thickness parameters are evaluated. 2D and 3D hybrid RANS-LES multiphase flow simulations of simplex nozzle are validated against the experimental data. Multiphase nature of the flow is modelled by volume of fluid method. The main goal is to assess the capabilities and drawbacks of 2D axisymmetric and full sector 3D modeling approaches. It is observed that although full sector 3D simulations require HPC cluster systems, accuracies in validation parameters are quite satisfying. Conversely, 2D axisymmetric simulations which can be run on a single core and give a general outlook of the flow field, they show an overshoot of CD and film thickness over the selected range of flow rate. It is shown that this overshoot is mostly related with the inlet boundary condition, which can not take the flow contraction and/or separation at the inlet slots into account. After correcting the inlet velocity 2D simulations by using the 3D results, it is shown that the predictions can be quite close to the experimental data.Conference paperPublication Open Access Validation and comparison of 2D and 3D numerical simulations of flow in simplex nozzles(Europe, Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ILASS, 2021-08-31) Bal, M.; Kayansalçik, Gökhan; Ertunç, Özgür; Böke, Y. E.; Mechanical Engineering; ERTUNÇ, Özgür; Kayansalçik, GökhanNumerical simulations of pressure swirl atomizers are computationally expensive due to transient and multiphase flow behavior. In this study, 2D and 3D VOF simulations are performed for a geomerty which has high swirl chamber length-to-diameter ratio of 1.33. discharge coefficient (CD) and spray angle values are compared to the experimental data. Moreover, a benchmark study is conducted between 2D and 3D methods in terms of accuracy, computational cost and flow variables such as orifice exit axial and tangential velocity. The simulations are performed using a hybrid RANS-LES approach, IDDES model. It is observed that 2D simulation has lower accuracy in the validation parameters such as discharge coefficient and spray angle as compared to the 3D simulation. The main reason for 2D simulation inaccuracy might be the tangential port inlet effects and wrong estimation of the loss of swirl inside the swirl chamber. On the other hand, 2D simulations have approximately 1000 times lower computational cost than 3D simulations.