Yang, K. K.Çayırlı, Tuğba2021-03-032021-03-032020-01-020160-5682http://hdl.handle.net/10679/7360https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1557023This study investigates demand and capacity strategies for managing clinic variability. These include (i) same-day scheduling to control random walk-ins, (ii) no-show intervention, where the clinic calls advance-booked patients a day before to identify and release cancelled slots to same-day patients, and (iii) adjustments to daily number of appointments for advance-booked patients to match seasonal variations in same-day demand. These strategies are tested over the individual-block/fixed-interval (IBFI) and the Dome appointment rules. Our results show that choosing the appropriate refinements in the order of appointment rules, same-day scheduling, no-show intervention, and capacity adjustment provides maximum improvement. The total cost benefit of demand strategies (i) and (ii) is 7 to 21%, whereas the benefit of capacity strategy (iii) is as high as 6%. Our study affirms the universality of the Dome rule to perform well when combined with the demand and capacity strategies across different environments.enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessArticle71113315200058941880000910.1080/01605682.2018.1557023Appointment schedulingOpen accessSame-day demand and walk-insSimulation2-s2.0-85062367214