Şahin-Mencütek, Z.Gökalp-Aras, N. E.Kaya, A.Rottmann, Susan Beth2024-01-242024-01-2420232364-4087http://hdl.handle.net/10679/9089https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27366-7_5Strategic temporality permeates the integration experience of Turkey’s Syrians in a number of ways. First, given their temporary legal status, there is a grey area between reception and integration, which is highly symbolic of ambiguous inclusion (Kaya & Nagel, 2021). Until recently, there has been no publicly announced national integration policy; instead, there was only a discourse about uyum (social harmony) that is not premised on permanent inclusion or equal rights with locals. Further, refugees face liminality in every possible sphere governing long-term settlement, such as in the labour market, education, housing, health and citizenship. Most work informally and experience economic precarity; a third of Syrian children are not in school; refugees must secure their own (often substandard) housing; linguistic and other barriers prevent full health care access, and pathways to citizenship or long-term permanent residence are limited. All of this creates feelings of profound anxiety and uncertainty for refugees as they go about their day-to-day lives.engopenAccessAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/bookPart12715010.1007/978-3-031-27366-7_52-s2.0-85151250705