Güçler, Arda2021-02-012021-02-012020-02-010191-4537http://hdl.handle.net/10679/7253https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719839452What gives representation its democratic essence? The recent democratic theory literature, particularly spearheaded by Nadia Urbinati, defends representative mediation as a facilitator of ongoing democratic contestation and revision. While I agree with this agonistic defence, I take issue with how Urbinati construes it. For her, representative contestation works in the teleological sense of testing opinions over time and sublimating them into ideological forms as a safeguard against the threat of immediacy (i.e. arbitrariness and authenticity). This article locates the traces of such presentism within Urbinati's own teleological framework, which I see as compromising her commitment to the agonistic vein in representative politics. When our relationship to the future is imagined from such a teleological angle, I argue, the scope of our representative options becomes significantly narrowed down and the possibility of beginning anew looks quite slim. I develop this critique by tapping into Jacques Derrida's affirmation of untimeliness.enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessArticle46222424600050846660001010.1177/0191453719839452Democratic theoryJacques DerridaNadia UrbinatiPolitical representationUntimeliness2-s2.0-85063988288