Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSelgin, G.
dc.contributor.authorBeckworth, D.
dc.contributor.authorBahadır, Berrak
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-23T11:11:00Z
dc.date.available2015-10-23T11:11:00Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.identifier.issn0161-8938
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/959
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893815000277
dc.description.abstractIt is widely believed that, in the wake of the dot.com crash, the Fed kept the federal funds target rate too low for too long, inadvertently contributing to the subprime boom. We attribute this and other Fed departures from a “neutral” policy stance to the Fed's failure to respond appropriately to exceptional rates of total factor productivity growth. We then show how the Fed, by adhering to a nominal GDP growth rate target, might have succeeded in maintaining such a neutral stance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Policy Modeling
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.titleThe productivity gap: Monetary policy, the subprime boom, and the post-2001 productivity surgeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionpre-print
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatuspublisheden_US
dc.contributor.departmentÖzyeğin University
dc.contributor.authorID(ORCID & YÖK ID 234939) Bahadır, Berrak
dc.contributor.ozuauthorBahadır, Berrak
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage189
dc.identifier.endpage207
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000353871500002
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.02.005
dc.subject.keywordsProductivityen_US
dc.subject.keywordsNeutral interest rateen_US
dc.subject.keywordsOutput gapen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBusiness cycleen_US
dc.identifier.scopusSCOPUS:2-s2.0-84926331465
dc.contributor.authorFemale1
dc.relation.publicationcategoryArticle - International Refereed Journal - Institutional Academic Staff


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Share this page