Publication:
The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: a case of faculty academic performance evaluation

dc.contributor.authorOral, Muhittin
dc.contributor.authorOukil, A.
dc.contributor.authorMalouin, J.-L.
dc.contributor.authorKettani, O.
dc.contributor.departmentBusiness Administration
dc.contributor.ozuauthorORAL, Muhittin
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-23T11:44:41Z
dc.date.available2015-10-23T11:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.descriptionDue to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.
dc.description.abstractData envelopment analysis (DEA) is in fact more than just being an instrument for measuring the relative efficiencies of a group of decision making units (DMU). DEA models are also means of expressing appreciative democratic voices of DMUs. This paper proposes a methodology for allocating premium points to a group of professors using three models sequentially: (1) a DEA model for appreciative academic self-evaluation, (2) a DEA model for appreciative academic cross-evaluation, and (3) a Non-DEA model for academic rating of professors for the purpose of premium allocations. The premium results, called DEA results, are then compared with the premium points “nurtured” by the Dean, called N bonus points. After comparing DEA results and N bonus points, the Dean reassessed his initial bonus points and provided new ones – called DEA-N decisions. The experience indicates that judgmental decisions (Dean's evaluations) can be enhanced by making use of formal models (DEA and Non-DEA models). Moreover, the appreciative and democratic voices of professors are virtually embedded in the DEA models.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seps.2013.08.003
dc.identifier.endpage28
dc.identifier.issn0038-0121
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84893722029
dc.identifier.startpage20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/960
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2013.08.003
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.identifier.wos000365646300005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedyes
dc.publicationstatuspublished
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofSocio-Economic Planning Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational Refereed Journal
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subject.keywordsDEA
dc.subject.keywordsAppreciative democratic voice
dc.subject.keywordsSelf and cross-efficiency
dc.subject.keywordsFaculty evaluation
dc.subject.keywordsAcademic performance
dc.subject.keywordsJudgmental decision
dc.titleThe appreciative democratic voice of DEA: a case of faculty academic performance evaluation
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3920f480-c8c2-457c-8c42-5e73823c300f
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3920f480-c8c2-457c-8c42-5e73823c300f

Files