Publication:
Multi-criteria performance evaluation of a glass panel system using full-scale experimental data

dc.contributor.authorIlter, E.
dc.contributor.authorCelik, O. C.
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Gülten Aslıhan
dc.contributor.departmentArchitecture
dc.contributor.ozuauthorÜNLÜ, Gülten Aslıhan
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-24T10:54:21Z
dc.date.available2020-11-24T10:54:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-01
dc.description.abstractIn order to better evaluate the lifetime performance of glass panel facade systems, this study firstly proposes to conduct a full-scale wind resistance, air/water infiltration, and seismic resistance tests. Two specimens were designed, constructed, and tested for this purpose. A fatigue process is also applied to one of the manufactured systems in addition to a standard test procedure. Secondly, data acquired from the experimental part of this work have been used in a multi-criteria performance evaluation process to determine the performance levels of each of the specimens. In the evaluation process, a total of 10 different criteria and 2 alternatives are identified for decision making. Performance indicator data obtained from the detailed calculations using the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) and TOPSIS (The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methods are then utilized during the numerical assessment process. The 'criticality level' is defined within the evaluation process and it indicates the percent (%) values of the obtained performance indicators. As a result of the performance evaluations, the AHP and TOPSIS methods gave similar results and could be selected as the preferred methods for the evaluation of such experimental data. Results obtained from the AHP and TOPSIS methods are consistent and easy to interpret when compared to the COPRAS method. Furthermore, in this work, the most critical criterion is found to be the frontal deflections.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFacade Testing Institute (FTI) ; Metal Yapi A.S., Istanbul
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00038628.2020.1774861en_US
dc.identifier.endpage525
dc.identifier.issn0003-8628en_US
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087164889
dc.identifier.startpage507
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/7134
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2020.1774861
dc.identifier.volume63
dc.identifier.wos000547279200001
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchitectural Science Review
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational Refereed Journal
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subject.keywordsGlass panelen_US
dc.subject.keywordsUnitized facadeen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFacade testingen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFacade fatigue processen_US
dc.subject.keywordsExperimental performance evaluationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsMulti-criteria evaluationen_US
dc.titleMulti-criteria performance evaluation of a glass panel system using full-scale experimental dataen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication90b26182-c9cb-45ba-8961-d43ebaafde63
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery90b26182-c9cb-45ba-8961-d43ebaafde63

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.45 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections