Publication:
Modal characterization of additively manufactured TPMS structures: comparison between different modeling methods

dc.contributor.authorŞimşek, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Aykan
dc.contributor.authorGayir, C. E.
dc.contributor.authorBaşaran, Cansu
dc.contributor.authorŞendur, Polat
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.ozuauthorŞENDUR, Polat
dc.contributor.ozugradstudentŞimşek, Uğur
dc.contributor.ozugradstudentAkbulut, Aykan
dc.contributor.ozugradstudentBaşaran, Cansu
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-23T08:38:23Z
dc.date.available2021-02-23T08:38:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-14
dc.description.abstractThe use of lattice structures has received increasing interest in various engineering applications owing to their high strength to weight ratio. Advances in additive manufacturing technologies enabled the manufacturing of highly complex lattice structures such as triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) models in recent years. The application of simulation tools is expected to enhance the performance of these designs further. Therefore, it is vital to understand their accuracy and computational efficiency. In this paper, modal characterization of additively manufactured TPMS structures is studied using five different modeling methods for a beam, which is composed of primitive, diamond, IWP, and gyroid unit cells. These methods include (1) shell modeling, (2) solid modeling, (3) homogenization, (4) super-element modeling, and (5) voxelization. The modal characterization is performed by using modal analysis, and the aforementioned models are compared in terms of their computational efficiency and accuracy. The results are experimentally validated by performing an experimental modal testing on a test specimen, made of HS188, and manufactured by direct metal laser melting. Finally, the relationship between the modal characteristics and volume fraction is derived by carrying out a parametric study for all types of TMPS structures considered in this paper. The complex modal characteristics of different TPMS types suggest that they can be jointly used to meet the ever-challenging design requirements using the modeling guidelines proposed in this study.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTÜBİTAK
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00170-020-06174-0en_US
dc.identifier.endpage674
dc.identifier.issn0268-3768en_US
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092445368
dc.identifier.startpage657
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/7343
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06174-0
dc.identifier.volume115
dc.identifier.wos000577238700006
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relationinfo:turkey/grantAgreement/TUBITAK/5158001
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational Refereed Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subject.keywordsAdditive manufacturingen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSandwich structureen_US
dc.subject.keywordsTriply periodic minimal surfacesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subject.keywordsModal analysisen_US
dc.titleModal characterization of additively manufactured TPMS structures: comparison between different modeling methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationdaa77406-1417-4308-b110-2625bf3b3dd7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydaa77406-1417-4308-b110-2625bf3b3dd7

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.45 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: