Publication: Terörizmin finansmanının önlenmesi hakkında Kanun’un mülkiyet hakkı açısından değerlendirilmesi
Institution Authors
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type
article
Access
restrictedAccess
Publication Status
Published
Abstract
Terörizmin finansmanına karşı yürütülen hukuki mücadele, 11 Eylül 2001 saldırılarının ardından farklı bir önem kazanmıştır. Terörizmin finansmanına ilişkin birçok uluslararası sözleşmeye taraf olan ve kanunlarında bu yönde düzenlemeler yapmış olan Türkiye açısından hukuki durum, 5549 sayılı Suç Gelirlerinin Aklanmasının Önlenmesine Dair Kanun ve bu Kanun'un uygulanması için çıkartılan Yönetmelik sonrası yeni tartışmalara açık hale gelmiştir. Bu bağlamda mahkeme kararı olmaksızın idari kararlarla kişilerin malvarlıklarının dondurulabilmesi, hukuk devleti ve onun yansıması olan belirlilik ilkesi açısından sorunlara yol açabilecek ve kişilerin mülkiyet hakkını ihlal edebilecektir.
The legal actions that have been taken against financing of terrorism have become more important after 9/11 attacks. In Turkey, which is one of the signatory states of several international conventions on fighting against financing terrorism and has made some legal arrangements on this issue, legal situation has become more disputable after the enactment of Law No. 5549 on Prevention of Laundering Proceeds of Crime and its applicable regulation. In this context, the possibility to freeze the assets of ones not by a court decision, but by an administrative decision could cause some problems related to rule of law and the principle of clarity and definiteness which is seen as a reflection thereof. Therefore, right to property of involved ones could be violated.
The legal actions that have been taken against financing of terrorism have become more important after 9/11 attacks. In Turkey, which is one of the signatory states of several international conventions on fighting against financing terrorism and has made some legal arrangements on this issue, legal situation has become more disputable after the enactment of Law No. 5549 on Prevention of Laundering Proceeds of Crime and its applicable regulation. In this context, the possibility to freeze the assets of ones not by a court decision, but by an administrative decision could cause some problems related to rule of law and the principle of clarity and definiteness which is seen as a reflection thereof. Therefore, right to property of involved ones could be violated.
Date
2014
Publisher
Seçkin Yayıncılık