Publication:
Numerical analysis of segmental tunnel linings - Use of the beam-spring and solid-interface methods

dc.contributor.authorRashiddel, A.
dc.contributor.authorHajihassani, M.
dc.contributor.authorKharghani, M.
dc.contributor.authorValizadeh, Hadi
dc.contributor.authorRahmannejad, R.
dc.contributor.authorDias, D.
dc.contributor.departmentCivil Engineering
dc.contributor.ozuauthorVALIZADEH, Hadı
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T10:20:38Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T10:20:38Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-16
dc.description.abstractThe effect of segmental joints is one of main importance for the segmental lining design when tunnels are excavated by a mechanized process. In this paper, segmental tunnel linings are analyzed by two numerical methods, namely the Beam-Spring Method (BSM) and the Solid-Interface Method (SIM). For this purpose, the Tehran Subway Line 6 Tunnel is considered to be the reference case. Comprehensive 2D numerical simulations are performed considering the soil's calibrated plastic hardening model (PH). Also, an advanced 3D numerical model was used to obtain the stress relaxation value. The SIM numerical model is conducted to calculate the average rotational stiffness of the longitudinal joints considering the joints bending moment distribution and joints openings. Then, based on the BSM, a sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the ground rigidity, depth to diameter ratios, slippage between the segment and ground, segment thickness, number of segments and pattern of joints. The findings indicate that when the longitudinal joints are flexible, the soil-segment interaction effect is significant. The joint rotational stiffness effect becomes remarkable with increasing the segment thickness, segment number, and tunnel depth. The pattern of longitudinal joints, in addition to the joint stiffness ratio and number of segments, also depends on the placement of longitudinal joints of the key segment in the tunnel crown (similar to patterns B and B').en_US
dc.description.versionPublisher versionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/gae.2022.29.4.471en_US
dc.identifier.endpage486en_US
dc.identifier.issn2005-307Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130447087
dc.identifier.startpage471en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/8054
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2022.29.4.471
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wos000799577600008
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.publisherTechno-Press (테크노프레스)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeomechanics and Engineering
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational Refereed Journal
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subject.keywordsBeam-springen_US
dc.subject.keywordsJoint positionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsRotational stiffnessen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSegment thicknessen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSoil-segmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordsSolid-interfaceen_US
dc.titleNumerical analysis of segmental tunnel linings - Use of the beam-spring and solid-interface methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationaf7d5a6d-1e33-48a1-94e9-8ec45f2d8c85
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaf7d5a6d-1e33-48a1-94e9-8ec45f2d8c85

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.45 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: