Publication:
Effect of different surface treatments on retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns

dc.contributor.authorOzyetim, E. B.
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBaşım, Gül Bahar
dc.contributor.authorBayraktar, G.
dc.contributor.departmentMechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.ozuauthorBAŞIM DOĞAN, Gül Bahar
dc.contributor.ozugradstudentÖzdemir, Zeynep
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T11:48:29Z
dc.date.available2023-10-30T11:48:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the effect of different treatments applied to titanium implant abutment surfaces on the retention of implant-supported crowns retained using resin cement. Materials and Methods: A total of 72 titanium implant abutments were divided into six groups (n = 12 each) based on the selected surface treatment: (1) untreated; (2) sandblasted; (3) hydrogen peroxide–etched; (4) atmospheric plasma; (5) chemical mechanical polishing; and (6) titanium dioxide nanocoating. After the surface treatments, scanning electron microscopy analyses and roughness measurements of the abutment surfaces were performed. Then, 72 metal copings were fabricated and cemented onto the abutments with dual-curing resin cement. After the thermocycling process, crown retention was measured by using a universal testing machine. The experimental results were statistically evaluated with one-way analysis of variance, Tukey honest significant difference, and Tamhane T2 tests. Results: The highest surface roughness values were obtained in the sandblasted group (1.44 um), which also showed in the highest retention values (828.5 N), followed by the hydrogen peroxide etching group (490.7 N), the atmospheric plasma group (466.5 N), the chemical mechanical polishing group (410.8 N), and the control group (382.6 N). Conclusion: Sandblasting, hydrogen peroxide, etching, and atmospheric plasma treatments significantly increased crown retention, and all alternative treatments, with the exception of TiO2 nanocoating, worked better than the control samples.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/ijp.6602en_US
dc.identifier.endpage58en_US
dc.identifier.issn0893-2174en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150226106
dc.identifier.startpage49en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/8901
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6602
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wos000942830300005
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co. Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational Refereed Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.titleEffect of different surface treatments on retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crownsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationdaa77406-1417-4308-b110-2625bf3b3dd7
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydaa77406-1417-4308-b110-2625bf3b3dd7

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.45 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: