Browsing by Author "Khoa, D. T."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
ArticlePublication Metadata only Experience of shame in service failure context among restaurant frontline employees: does industry tenure matter?(Emerald, 2021-08-09) Wang, X.; Guchait, P.; Khoa, D. T.; Paşamehmetoğlu, Ayşın; Hotel Management; PAŞAMEHMETOĞLU, AyşınPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to integrate tenets from the appraisal-based model of self-conscious emotions and the compass of shame theory to examine restaurant frontline employees’ experience of shame following service failures, and how shame influences employees’ job attitude and behaviors. In addition, employees’ industry tenure is identified as an individual factor influencing the impacts of shame in resorting to literature on aging in emotion regulation. Design/methodology/approach: Using a survey methodology, 217 restaurant frontline employees and their supervisors in Turkey provided survey data. Partial least squares (PLS) method using SmartPLS 3.3.3 was used for data analysis. Findings: The results indicated the maladaptive nature of shame following service failures as a salient self-conscious emotion, as it was negatively related to employee outcomes. Moreover, employees’ industry tenure played a moderating role that influences the impacts of shame on commitment to customer service. Practical implications: Managers should attend to frontline employees’ shame experience depending on their industry experience and adopt appropriate emotion intervention (e.g. cognitive reappraisal) or create error management culture to eliminate the negative effects of shame. Originality/value: This study advances our understanding of a powerful but understudied emotional experience, shame, in a typical shame-eliciting hospitality work setting (e.g. service failures). Shame has been linked with commitment to customer service and error reporting. In addition, industry tenure has been identified as a boundary condition to help clarify previous inconsistent findings in regard to the adaptive/maladaptive nature of shame.ArticlePublication Metadata only Hospitality employees’ affective experience of shame, self-efficacy beliefs and job behaviors: The alleviating role of error tolerance(Elsevier, 2022-04) Wang, X.; Guchait, P.; Khoa, D. T.; Paşamehmetoğlu, Ayşın; Wen, X.; Hotel Management; PAŞAMEHMETOĞLU, AyşınService management researchers have clearly demonstrated that customers experience various emotions in service failure situations. In comparison, hospitality employees’ emotional experiences in such situations, are relatively unknown, as they are often required to hide experienced emotions and express emotions in ways consistent with industry standards. To address this gap, we examine the typical emotional experience of shame in the wake of service failure and explain how it influences employees’ job behaviors—service recovery performance and organizational citizenship behavior—via self-efficacy beliefs. Furthermore, we draw on social information processing to introduce error tolerance as a social persuasion buffer that mitigates the negative effects of shame on self-efficacy perceptions. Survey data collected from 217 subordinate-supervisor dyads employed in restaurant settings reveal that shame experienced weakened employees’ self-efficacy beliefs, and these weakened beliefs were in turn negatively associated with job behaviors. Finally, error tolerance significantly moderated the relationship between shame and self-efficacy.ArticlePublication Metadata only How organizational dehumanization impacts hospitality employees service recovery performance and sabotage behaviors: the role of psychological well-being and tenure(Emerald, 2023-01-02) Gip, H.; Guchait, P.; Paşamehmetoğlu, Ayşın; Khoa, D. T.; Hotel Management; PAŞAMEHMETOĞLU, AyşınPurpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the mediating effect of psychological well-being between organizational dehumanization and two outcome variables: service recovery performance and service sabotage. This research also investigates whether organizational tenure moderates the relationship between organizational dehumanization and psychological well-being. Design/methodology/approach: Using survey methodology, 200 hotel frontline service employees (FLEs) in Turkey were sampled over two time points. Additionally, employees’ direct supervisors rated their service recovery performance. The partial least squares method, specifically SmartPLS 3.3.3, was used for data analysis. Findings: The results indicate that organizational dehumanization negatively influences employees’ psychological well-being. However, organizational tenure moderates this relationship, in which organizational dehumanization has less of a negative effect on employees’ psychological well-being in those with longer tenure. Psychological well-being was found to mediate the relationship between organizational dehumanization and service recovery performance. Finally, psychological well-being mediates the relationship between organizational dehumanization and service sabotage. Practical implications: Managers should consider the negative effect organizational dehumanization has on FLEs’ psychological well-being and aim to establish an organizational culture that values these employees as individuals and as invaluable resources for the organization. Further, this study has found that less tenured employees are less likely to have the psychological resources to cope with organizational dehumanization and are more susceptible to decreased productivity (i.e. service recovery performance) and engaging in counterproductive work behaviors (i.e. service sabotage) due to mistreatment in the workplace. Originality/value: This study furthers our understanding of organizational dehumanization, an understudied concept in hospitality research, which influences employee outcomes. The findings of this study contribute to the advancement of the self-determination theory and how organizational dehumanization impacts psychological well-being. It also contributes to the conservation of resources theory and current literature on service recovery performance and service sabotage.