Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaşım, Gül Bahar
dc.contributor.authorKhalili, M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T11:11:36Z
dc.date.available2015-12-02T11:11:36Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.issn1568-5527
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092188311400260X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/1229
dc.descriptionDue to copyright restrictions, the access to the full text of this article is only available via subscription.en_US
dc.description.abstractParticle size distribution of powders plays a very important role in determining the critical chemical and physical properties of the particulate systems. Precise determination of particle size distribution depends on effective sampling of the powders, which is more pronounced for the particulate systems with a wide particle size distribution. Predominantly, the significant increase in the total surface area of the powders at nanometer scale particle sizes may lead to improper characterization of the bulk if the sampling technique fails to collect and represent them in the analyses. In this study, effects of sampling on the precision of particle size analysis are studied on a clay sample with a wide particle size distribution (particles ranging from nanometer to micrometer sizes) using light scattering technique in aqueous media. Three different sampling methods are applied to systematically analyze the effect of sampling on particle size measurements including; riffling the original sample into sixteen equal parts, sampling the powder after removing the very fine and very coarse size particles and riffling to sixteen parts and finally by riffling the powder to the exact feed amount of the particle size analyzer. The effectiveness of the applied methods were compared statistically by calculating the coefficient of variance (CV) values of the 10%, 50% and 90% passing particle size data of the sequential runs. The most effective sampling method was determined to be riffling the sample to the exact feed amount of the analyzer based on obtaining the minimum CV values of the measurements. In the second part of the study, results of size distribution analyses conducted by different particle size analyzers utilizing numerous characterization techniques are compared using the most effective sampling technique developed in the first part. It is observed that the use of different characterization equipment tend to result in variations in the particle size distributions of the same powder which presents another variability in classification of the wide particle size distribution powders.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAdvanced Powder Technology
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleParticle size analysis on wide size distribution powders; effect of sampling and characterization techniqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatuspublisheden_US
dc.contributor.departmentÖzyeğin University
dc.contributor.authorID(ORCID 0000-0002-2049-4410 & YÖK ID 124618) Başım, Bahar
dc.contributor.ozuauthorBaşım, Gül Bahar
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage200
dc.identifier.endpage207
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000349758600027
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apt.2014.09.009
dc.subject.keywordsParticle size distributionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsWide particle size distribution powdersen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSamplingen_US
dc.identifier.scopusSCOPUS:2-s2.0-84922750218
dc.contributor.authorMale1
dc.relation.publicationcategoryArticle - International Refereed Journal - Institutional Academic Staff


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Share this page