Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeyis, Senem
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T12:44:41Z
dc.date.available2019-09-05T12:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01
dc.identifier.issn0733-9364en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/6262
dc.identifier.urihttps://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001681
dc.description.abstractAlthough a plethora of studies on building information modeling (BIM) have been conducted in the last decade, none of the previous studies collate and/or prioritize the benefits, risks, and challenges of BIM based on the data collected from a comprehensive literature review and subject matter experts (SMEs). In order to allow architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) professionals and academics see the true potential of BIM in a wider context and help them understand its multiorganizational and multidisciplinary functions, there is an obvious necessity for identifying, classifying, and prioritizing the pros and cons of BIM; however, such a study is still currently absent in the AEC literature. The aim of this study is to identify, classify, and rank the pros and cons of BIM that address the benefits, challenges, and risks of BIM in the transition from computer-aided design (CAD). A literature review was performed and face-to-face semistructured interviews with SMEs on BIM were conducted for identification and classification purposes. A total of 41 types of benefits, 11 types of risks, and 13 types of challenges of BIM were identified via triangulation of literature review and face-to-face semistructured interviews with SMEs. The Delphi method was performed for prioritizing the benefits of BIM in terms of time, cost, and sustainability as well as the risks and challenges of BIM encountered in the transition process from CAD to BIM. The interrater agreement and significance-level statistics were performed to analyze and validate the consensus reached by the Delphi panel experts. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge on BIM by providing comprehensive identification and classification of the benefits, challenges, and risks of BIM, and prioritization of the benefits for BIM in terms of time, cost, and sustainability as well as the risks and challenges of BIM. The priority rankings of benefits, risks, and challenges of BIM ensure successful completion of projects and create additional value by allowing professionals to make well-informed decisions that support decreasing time and cost-related waste in the transition process from CAD to BIM.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titlePros and cons of using building information modeling in the aec industryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.peerreviewedyesen_US
dc.publicationstatusPublisheden_US
dc.contributor.departmentÖzyeğin University
dc.contributor.authorID(ORCID 0000-0002-9133-9899 & YÖK ID 258625) Seyis, Senem
dc.contributor.ozuauthorSeyis, Senem
dc.identifier.volume145en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000471697700003
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001681en_US
dc.subject.keywordsBuilding information modelingen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBenefits of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subject.keywordsChallenges of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subject.keywordsRisks of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subject.keywordsPros and cons of building information modeling (BIM)en_US
dc.subject.keywordsDelphi methoden_US
dc.identifier.scopusSCOPUS:2-s2.0-85067247967
dc.contributor.authorFemale1
dc.relation.publicationcategoryArticle - International Refereed Journal - Institutional Academic Staff


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Share this page