Lawhttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/4252024-03-29T11:01:04Z2024-03-29T11:01:04ZPublic policy in the enforcement of forein arbitral awards in the light of the judgments of the court of cassationEkşi, Nurayhttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/92882024-03-12T08:02:40Z2020-01-01T00:00:00ZPublic policy in the enforcement of forein arbitral awards in the light of the judgments of the court of cassation
Ekşi, Nuray
In this study, first, the concepts of "recognition" and "enforcement" of foreign arbitral awards will be explained. Then, the legal basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be clarified. The principles proposed in the academic circles to prevent the use of public policy beyond its purpose in enforcement of foreign arbitral awards proceedings will be briefly explained. Following that, what is considered by the doctrine to be part of public policy will be addressed. Thereafter, the attempts made by the courts framing public policy as an impediment to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be addressed. In addition, the elements which, in Court of Cassation decisions, are considered to be public policy grounds that justify denial of enforcement of foreign arbitral awards will be evaluated under ten headings. In the last part of the study, the effect of public policy on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards containing peculiar features will be examined. Three topics will be discussed under this title: first, the effect of public policy on enforcement of interim measures granted by arbitrators; second, the effect of public policy on the enforcement of the RICO or punitive damages awards, and third, the effect of public policy on the recognition of the anti-suit injunctions ordered by arbitrators. Our general evaluation regarding public policy as a bar to enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in terms of Turkish doctrine and practice will be presented in the conclusion.
2020-01-01T00:00:00ZUnderstanding the 21st century's specific Eurasian regional security and energy security parameters in the Turkish-American relationship: A case study on South Caucasus and Central AsiaKısacık, Sinahttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/92482024-03-01T08:05:01Z2020-07-15T00:00:00ZUnderstanding the 21st century's specific Eurasian regional security and energy security parameters in the Turkish-American relationship: A case study on South Caucasus and Central Asia
Kısacık, Sina
Eurasia has been of great importance for many centuries due to its possession of strategic trade routes and energy resources. Within this context, several states within this region, as well as outside powers, have been placing unique significance to this region in their foreign policy considerations for many decades. Countries that have been placed in South Caucasia and Central Asia were ruled by Soviets until 1991 and then gained their independence following the dissolution of the Soviet Empire. After gaining independence, these states have become more important actors in global politics due to their strategic positioning in Eurasia, reemergence of frozen conflicts between them, and most importantly, the possession of huge hydrocarbon resources in this region. In that sense, Turkey, having close political, economic, cultural, and religious links with Azerbaijan, Georgia, and all Turkic speaking-Central Asian states, has been following a multi-dimensional foreign policy towards this region. The United States (U.S.) on the other hand, as the world's only superpower left, has also been attaching special importance and following multi-dimensional strategies towards South Caucasia and Central Asia within the context of its "Wider Eurasian Strategy". In addition, both Ankara and Washington pursue these multi-dimensional foreign, security, and energy policies by considering the Russian Federation's foreign, security, and energy policy priorities, since Russia is still the dominant power in the region.
2020-07-15T00:00:00ZReforming Laïcité or reforming islam? Secularism, islam, and the regulation of religion in FranceArslan, Berna ZenginAçımuz, Hayriye Bigehttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/83162023-05-30T12:18:30Z2021-01-01T00:00:00ZReforming Laïcité or reforming islam? Secularism, islam, and the regulation of religion in France
Arslan, Berna Zengin; Açımuz, Hayriye Bige
This paper focuses on management of Islam by the French State since the state of emergency declared in 2015. We analyze the legal actions of the State using a law-in-context approach and theorize secularism as the State's management of religion. We focus on the Senate Report (2016) concerning Muslim worship, the legal changes wrought by the state of emergency, and the institutions formed to govern Islam and secularism. We examine whether there has been a change in the French State's approach to Muslim worship. Rather than remaining neutral, the French State has become even more actively involved in the field of religion by adopting a reformist attitude intended to transform not the principles of laïcité but the Muslims in France. In this period, the State has taken concrete steps and built institutions both to support the formation of a secularized French Islam and to govern the boundaries of laïcité.
2021-01-01T00:00:00ZThe noteworthy regional energy security initiatives of Turkey in Recep Tayyip Erdoğan period: just being a transit state or more than that?Kısacık, Sinahttp://hdl.handle.net/10679/83112023-05-30T12:18:30Z2021-01-01T00:00:00ZThe noteworthy regional energy security initiatives of Turkey in Recep Tayyip Erdoğan period: just being a transit state or more than that?
Kısacık, Sina
N/A
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z